A Quantitative Analysis of LDS General Conference Discourse, 1942 to 2026
6,322 talks. 12.1 million words. Seven independent metrics. 84 years of data.
Data: BYU Scripture Citation Index (scriptures.byu.edu)
Includes President Oaks' first General Conference (April 2026)
Select eras to highlight across all charts. Switch metrics in the focus chart. Toggle comparison mode to view two eras side by side on a radar chart.
The Reformation Index is a composite of seven metrics. Each is scaled 0 to 100, where 0 is peak LDS distinctiveness and 100 is full Protestant convergence. For 76 years it fluctuated between 18 and 32, a net movement of 3.9 points. Under Nelson it moved 32.8 points in 7 years: 91 times the historical rate.
How often does conference mention the sitting president versus the founding prophet? For eight decades, Joseph Smith dominated. Then that changed.
The ratio of quotes attributed to the living prophet versus quotes attributed to Joseph Smith.
Tracking distinctively LDS terms (e.g. "dispensation," "priesthood keys," "plan of salvation") against generically Protestant terms (e.g. "grace alone," "born again," "personal relationship with Jesus").
The balance of grace language versus works language in conference talks, measured by term frequency per talk.
Tracking four categories of theosis language: Hard Theosis ("become gods"), Exaltation (celestial kingdom / eternal increase), Soft Theosis ("become like God"), and Protestant Replacement ("relationship with Christ" / generic salvation).
References to traditionally Protestant liturgical terms (Lent, Advent, Holy Week, Good Friday, Palm Sunday, Ash Wednesday) in General Conference.
Measuring two competing streams: hard materialist claims about the Godhead (separate beings, body of flesh and bone, First Vision physicality) versus generic piety language (personal relationship with Christ, come unto Jesus, etc.).
Same regex methodology applied to a separate corpus: 951 First Presidency discourses from the Journal of Discourses (Brigham Young, John Taylor, Heber C. Kimball, George Q. Cannon, and others). This is not General Conference — it is a separate baseline showing what LDS leadership discourse sounded like at peak theological distinctiveness.
jod_scraper_analyzer.py to generate verified numbers from 951 JoD discourses. The estimates below are conservative projections based on documented JoD content.
These doctrines were actively taught in the JoD era but have completely vanished from modern General Conference.
Combining both datasets into a single timeline view. The JoD baseline (purple) represents peak LDS distinctiveness. The GC data (teal/red) shows the 84-year trajectory from 1942 to 2026.